Find a Lawyer

TERRY TOWLLERS (PVT.) LTD. versus MUHAMMAD YOUNUS SHAH KHAN

Sindh Rented Premise Ordinance 1979 Section 16 (1) (2) Tenant overcoming tenant rents was instructed to submit residual rent to the tenant on temporary defenses under the rent order and the tenant. In the future, the rent was taken over by the rent controller in monthly rent. The tenants, in their application for a temporary rental order revision, as well as the temporary deposit in compliance with the rental order, claimed that they had not taken any defect in the payment of rent because they regularly paid the income tax for the landlord. Used to pay rent. According to the landlord's direction, the tenant further claimed that when the income tax department refused to receive further rent after receiving the rent for twenty-two months, he sent the landlord rent for six months, but he Refused to accept and, upon refusing to the landlord, filed a miscellaneous petition and began to submit the rent to the court, the landlord did not deny the facts stated by the tenant, but the rent controller temporarily These facts were not taken into consideration by the rent controller before the rental order was approved, Whether the tenant order made a deliberate default promise in respect of the tenant premises, which was restricting the tenant's defense based on a rented order based on the facts. Was approved without. The record could not be retained, the order was separated in the circumstances and after checking the records on the record, the fresh benefit of collecting the disputed rent. immigration advocates from Shujabad lawyer