HAIDER JAFFARY versus THE STATE
Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hodg) Ordinance 1979 Section 17 (1) Definition of Evidence The solitary witness (complainant) of this incident not only went far beyond the original story, but his testimony also faced many contradictions. But the crime was not even a weapon. Evidence was presented and his recovery was suspicious, no question was asked of the accused in his examination under section 342. The PC, regarding the recovery of the weapons of crime, could not be used against them legally, causing great prejudice against them and they had to look into all the circumstances which were against them with evidence. Was denied the right to explain. There is a dispute and dispute between the complainant and the accused which left the accused in bad shape.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Fateh Jang lawyer