Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Complaint Notice Limitation Complaint in which the employee claimed to have released his salary and was on active duty was rejected by the Labor Court on the basis that he was sent by the employee after a period of four years. Complaint notices were time-barred. The service was not terminated by any order of termination, but it was put on the waiting list for new posting. The new posting order did not arrive and the wait was delayed and the job waiting. Employees were not paid wages, which would be a permanent cause. At the time of stopping the notice of complaint when a question arises after the employee is terminated or dismissed, but in the case of the employee no such order was stated, but he was only to wait for the assignment like this. The employee kept working
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
