Order of Civil Procedure Code X of the parties' CPC examinations by the court OX, R 4 (2) and section 115, dismissed the case if the defendant failed to appear despite the court's instruction and the respondent's objection I should record his statement. Were not signed by the claimant themselves. The order of dismissal of this case was affirmed by the appellate court. The presence of a lawyer's lawyer was also required to obtain the signature of his sample. If the court deems it necessary after recording his statement, The action could not have taken place in the absence of the plaintiff when the plaintiff was on legal instructions to comply with the instructions unless a claim for waiver was made. Neither was excused from offering any legal excuse, according to the instruction that the court had not appeared before the plaintiff in the absence of the plaintiff's claim, and claimed that his suit had served in OS, R.C. In line with 4 (2), the CPC plaintiff had failed to sue for interference with the amended jurisdiction.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 1997
