Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD TARIQ versus FAZILAT

CPC Processing Orders and Orders of Civil Procedure Code Order XXI Section 47 and O XXI, R 2 Responding to the Court Despite the Compromise Agreement on the Processing of an Decision on Decision After Recording of Evidence and Recording of Evidence Happened in front of the dentist. , The applicant was filed by the applicant in reliance on OXXI, R 2, CPC and the same courts passed the orders passed against the provisions of the applicant O XXI, R 2, CPC instead of mandatory. Because there was no result to be found. The court should take into account the fundamental rights of the parties and should not only consider the technical merits of the procedure. The courts also had to keep in mind the purpose and intent with which Section 47 was enforced, so that the requirements of the law were not met. Whatever the requests were, the parties' address was also addressed through the formulation of the evidence and the recording of the evidence. Requires judgment and decision not to conform to the mere technical capabilities of national justice and procedure list of advocates from Depal Pur lawyer