Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD FAROOQ ALWARY versus PUNJAB UNIVERSITY

Para 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Students Physiotherapy was given 44 marks in the Viva Voce / Practice of BSc Physiotherapy Final Examination and failed in the entire exam by getting less than the required number in Viva Voce only. Was given. In the exam, the justified student demanded against the university to re-examine the second examiner and then declare the results in the light of the re-examination, making the inquiry where the court was satisfied that the student in the Viva / Practical Examination. The number obtained on the face appears to be insignificant in the face-to-face record, and they were not in line with the position that such student had obtained in the written papers, and he was suffering from discretion. And may re-evaluate the numbers assigned to the student. The same can be done in relation to the marks given in the written paper on the Viva Voice exam. It is permissible under the university calendar to make serious allegations against the principal, who was an inspector of Viva Voice and the fact that after the inquiry He was removed by the Chairman, Medical Board of Studies as an Internal Examiner and that the student did not have the marks obtained on the Viva voce exam. According to the position obtained in the written papers. And that was proved to be a failure with only one mark to prove that the recorders' verdict on the face of the record is flawed because the WaveVoice test is said about the award of numbers on the test. Was to be an applicant already immigration advocate from Muzaffarabad lawyer