KARACHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY versus IBNE RAZA
Punjab Local Councils Service (Appointment and Service Rules) Rules 1983 Rr 10, 18 and 22 West Pakistan Government Servants (Practices) Rules, 1966, Rr 19 and 29 Punjab Local Councils Service (Talent and Disposal) Rules, 1990, R 5 and transferred the unmanaged civil servant who was posted as the Chief Officer District Council in BS 17, was replaced \ M transferred and replaced by a public servant working as a tax officer in BS 16. Chief was appointed to the office of the Chief Officer District Council in his own salary and the transfer of the accuracy of the measure moved freely without decision. And approved the posting orders, but only on the recommendation of a local Member of the National Assembly who approached government employees and contacted government employees without examining the matter in accordance with policy and rules requirements. went. What posting of an officer should be based on his service record, eligibility, job requirements and public interest assessment should be done only in the public interest which should be of interest to public servants in performing their public duties. The task of suppressing individual interests and resolving conflicts can only be accomplished through the efficient use of bureaucratic power, which can be carried out in accordance with the criteria laid down. Section 9 of the Civil Servants Act or Section 9 of the Local Councils Service (Terms of Service and Rules) Rules 1983 does not endorse or validate rules, law and policy deviations from such standards. had gone. Beyond the law, policy, rules and regulations and all other interests
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Khushal Kot lawyer