Find a Lawyer

RASHID ALI versus SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, HEADQUARTERS, LAHORE

Police Rules 1934 R12 21 Punjab Police (Performance and Discipline) Rules, 1975, R6 employees were dismissed from their jobs on the job which was the police constable, it is alleged that he had quarreled with the head constable. And he also absent himself from duty for about six. For months, a public servant confessed that he quarreled with the head constable when he was humiliated by the head constable, but he insisted that the discharge from the job was legal only because of it. Can be imposed when his / her work and behavior has been poor for three years. Government employees further claimed in their trial that the supply of R12 21 of the Police Rules, 1934, could not be legally included in the case when they were charged with a special misconduct in which Under the Punjab Police Act (Discipline and Discipline) Rules, 1975 could only be implemented, having the power of a public servant, no law would be retained to exclude them from employment. A civil servant was ordered to be re-employed, but on charges of mismanagement, he was sentenced to two years in prison. law firms from Sita Road lawyer