Find a Lawyer

THE STATE versus MUHAMMAD HASHAM BABAR

Under section 497 and 561A Accountability Ordinance (XX of 1997), section 3 is not obliged to review the order for submission of cash security to the accused, power to seek cash security in the context of the Accountability Ordinance Court under the law. An off-court order was not ordered. Mathematically follow the securities systems provided in the Code of Criminal Procedure and have the power to demand cash security in appropriate cases under the new delivery order that the accused be released on bail subject to a cash security deposit. The sight was denied. Accordingly

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 1997

• FAIZ AHMAD v. METROPOLITAN CORPORATION, LAHORE 1997 CLC 599
• KALOO KHAN v. MUHAMMAD MANZOOR KHAN 1997 PCRLJ 600
• TALAH SAFDAR v. BASHIR AHMAD 1997 CLC 601
• IRSHAD AHMAD BHALLI v. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, LOCAL GOVERNMENT; AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, LAHORE 1997 PTD 605
• FAIZ AHMAD v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE 1997 PTD 609
• SYED IKHLAQ HUSSAIN SHAH v. THE STATE 1997 PCRLJ 610
• MUHAMMAD ASHRAF GONDA v. THE STATE 1997 PLD 614
• WAJID SHAMSUL HASSAN v. FEDERAITON FO PAKISTANI 1997 PLD 617

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 1997 →

how to become a advocate from Kasur lawyer

وکیل سے بات کریں مفت · منٹوں میں جواب