WAJID SHAMSUL HASSAN versus FEDERAITON FO PAKISTANI
Exit the provisions of the Pakistan (Control) Ordinance 1981 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199, 2A, 4, 9, 15 and 25 Constitutional application prohibiting the departure of Pakistan is the fundamental right of the citizen to travel abroad Art. 2A, 4, 9, 15 and 25 Guarantee, Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Legislative measures must be examined by the state on the touchstone of constitutional provisions, provided for in section 2. , Exit Pakistan (Control)) In the Ordinance, 1981 prohibiting a person from traveling abroad and denying him the precious right to listen and knowing the reasons for such action. Failure to provide any guidelines or reasonable rating against, was a pre-discrimination remedy and was also treated with discrimination as no reasons were assigned to the victim, so under Section 3 The method of revision, as represented by the Pakistan (Control) Ordinance 1981, justifies the I-ordinance, therefore, the Principal High Court of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) did not remain on the touchstones of Art 2A, 4, 9 and 25. May, order that the applicant's prohibited federal government order / actions by placing his name in the Exit Control List abroad The writ was of no legal authority and had no legal effect. The High Court ordered the petitioner to remain abroad without interruption or interruption by the Federal Government or any of its agencies or authorities. Let go
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Umer Kot lawyer