MUHAMMAD ILYAS KHAN, ADVOCATE versus ASAD ALI BILGRAMI, ADVOCATE
Review of Article 188 by the Supreme Court Applicants (Advocates) of the Supreme Court Rules O XXVI, RR 1, 31 and Article XXVI of the OV Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Has been found to be a crime. He was forced to enter the Chamber of Chief Justice of Pakistan without his permission when he was busy discussing some matters with the Attorney General of Pakistan and the acting Chief Justice, for a period of two years. Suspended from practice. With the direction of such registration in the record, the written apology submitted by the petitioners had convinced the court that they had indeed expressed their regret over the incident and thus had declared themselves free from contempt of court. Which resulted in the petitioners accepting the filed petitions and the order preventing them from acting as Advocates of the Supreme Court for a period of two years was withdrawn [contempt of court].
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
