ZAFARUL ISLAM versus ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER-1, HYDERABAD
Under Section 10 and 11 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), sections 52 and 164 of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Revenue Record entries reflect the affidavit of the applicants does. Effective documents filed with the constitutional petition show that the foregoing land was allotted to the interests of the applicants, and after his death, such land was seized by his successors and, subsequently, Lizzie. It was on this basis that Lizzie leased, got water and electricity connections. Documents cannot be smashed or rejected on the basis of an affidavit filed by such large-scale government workers (respondents) that such documents, especially when confirming original copies of documents to fake documents. The provisions of the proportional use of jurisdiction under section 164, the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967 were not valid calls to the Tourist who passed the order in question, though he was authorized to seek the record and if the record Considering this, it was his opinion that the action that was taken or issued should be amended or To be reversed, it must give such a report to the Commissioner in addition to his opinion. The Collector not only considered the jurisdiction illegal, but also demonstrated material irregularities in approving arbitrary orders that were beyond the scope of his authority, documenting the favor of Alte, his successors, and the lessee. The calculation of the evidence was not considered genuine by the Revenue function in the entire inquiry. The applicants in such inquiries
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
