Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

GHULAM QADIR versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF


A. XLVI, R 6 AJK Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), Section 112 (1) (b) Contract Act (I72 of 1872), Section 182 Supreme Court Decisions The ground for reviewing was that the party applying for leave for appeal could not file the same by the lawyer, for the Civil Procedure Code, which did not apply to proceedings before the effect of the Supreme Court of 1908. Although the CPC did not apply to proceedings before the Supreme Court, there is a clause of section 182, the Contract Act, 1872 gives the citizen the right to appoint an agent on his behalf, Section 182, Contract The T Act, 1872 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Supreme Court Rules, 1978 shall come under the definition of a lawyer agent, which does not prohibit the appointment of a lawyer. This means that such a right, which was available under the law of the land, will not be affected; the request for review was not guaranteed in any case.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocates from Rajanpur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.