Find a Lawyer

KHURSHID-UL-HASSAN versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

The Preamble to the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Government Act, 1970, the Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 1974), the regional quota of urban services in the 51st government services, through notification for each district of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Government, clarified on 5 July 1972. It has been suggested that if suitable candidates with the required merit were not available from this district, suitable candidates from other districts would be appointed. None of the candidates belonging to B&K districts are eligible for competitive examinations conducted by the Public Service Commission to fill the posts of Assistant Commissioners Appellant. He said that getting the second position in the exam and competitive exam is his own. He was unable to get an appointment from District P, so in terms of the notification of July 5, 1972, he claimed to be appointed to any of the two vacant seats in the district where no candidate had qualified the High Court on July 5, 1972. The notification issued, on which the appellant relied, had no legal power The request for a waiver by Yee, on 5 July 1972, was not stated by the appellant on which the reliance was placed. In the face of arguments before the High Court, such a verdict of fact cannot be decided by a court of law unless it is requested by the High Court, therefore, beyond the parties' requests. Did not travel according to the law. On July 5, 1972, the cancellation of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Act ceased to take effect, the 1970 bail was not granted, as the government itself was following the notification of March 12, 1972, which stated that every district K best advocate from Garh Maharaja lawyer