Sections 302 (b), 324, 337d and 34 Qutl M., Attempts to try Qutel, JEFA, Joint Complaints, Evidence Definition Benefit of Doubt Accused and accused accomplices, initially complainant in their report without charge Was accused of. Specific role Then, after being discharged from the hospital, the complainant recorded an additional statement, eighteen days after the incident, in which he assigned the specific role to each of the defendants in the supplementary statement, preliminary. Completed discharge from the contents of the report The complainant and the prosecution witness described their statements as deliberate and dishonest in reinforcing the prosecutor's case, saying that the credibility of the statements had been terminated and the identity value had fallen. , Eighteen days after the incident, the statement of the witness of the injured prosecutor was recorded by the police, and of this delay He was no explanation from the prosecution. In the statements of the prosecutor's witness, the eyewitness notes were relative. Although it was not enough to destroy a witness's testimony, the real test of the admissibility of a statement was whether the witness's statement was probable. This includes other evidence. And did it affect the prosecution's testimony and the prosecution's testimony, even though they had a seal of injury, and their presence on this occasion was not disputed, but just enough to understand the fact It cannot be assumed that he has told the whole truth. For witnesses, there was no yardstick for determining the truth or falsehood of a witness, not every injured witness spoke the truth, nor did every misguided witness lie, the presence of a witness was natural.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
