Find a Lawyer

MST. RUKHSANA versus GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA

Article 199 Constitution Petition Civil Service appointment, reliance on jurisdiction withdrew by Department The petitioner stayed against the defendants at the lower level as the applicant had no option to come before the cut date. The petitioner submitted a report on the violation. The terms and conditions mentioned in his appointment order were not based on merit. The applicant had no locus standi to inquire about the merits of the respondents as a result of their appointments, which could result in the applicant not identifying any weakness or invalidity in the order of his dismissal. The constitutional application at the merit was rejected in the circumstances

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015

• AMAN UL HAQ v. State 2015 MLD 518
• ABDUL QAYUM v. State 2015 PCrLJ 528
• Mst. SAMINA BIBI v. MUHAMMAD RAMZAN 2015 YLR 539
• SAHIBZADA v. State 2015 PCrLJ 554
• SULTAN MUHAMMAD v. COLLECTOR CUSTOMS 2015 PTD 570
• RIFATULLAH v. ABDUL QAYUM 2015 YLR 571
• SHAD MUHAMMAD v. Mst. SARWARA 2015 MLD 582
• SAJJAD AHMAD v. State 2015 PCrLJ 585

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2015 →

best law firm from Jehanian lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes