Find a Lawyer

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB versus SHAH MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY

Article 8 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) of the Punjab Civil Servants Act 1974 did not consider the promotion of a public servant as a stay-at-home depot with an independent body while his juniors were promoted. Government employee's department representation was unsuccessful Service Tribunal not accepted Government employees request that a public servant be promoted while on deputation and then asked to come back to benefit from their development. The address of the validity service tribunal was in accordance with the Government's policy letter, dated 20 I1 1982, that if the officer concerned was on deputation with an independent body, he should consider the matter on his turn and if his approval. If given, he should be notified of this decision and given the option to return to his parents' department within three months of the date on which the decision was made because of his progress or the decision was made. ? To him, whoever was later where the concerned officer returns to the parent department within a specified period, he should be promoted. Government service was not allowed to be retained in the public service nor was timely informed and Neither he was asked to return to his parents' field nor was he considered promoting the matter; the tribunal did not face any of the problems, promoted by a civil servant. The question of when her juniors were promoted in her previous history is that she is now only employed as a civil servant tribunal. The only official employee had found the conceptual status as civil servants immigration advocates email from Hariwala lawyer