MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE versus STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) has been charged with guaranteeing Section 497 Constitutional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 394 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) which does not include the FIR. Including the impact of a number of suspects in the air. Why the accused's identity test was not conducted by eyewitnesses after his name did not appear in the FIR for some cash before the police was charged, it could not be ascertained that the robbery. Was not enough to deprive them of their independent record. Having been robbed by him, it was not enough for him to be involved in the case in the absence of any further evidence that the plea for leave to appeal was converted into an appeal under the circumstances and thereby the accused was granted bail. Allowed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Khanewal lawyer