Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ANWAR RAHI versus MUHAMMAD AFZAL KHAN

Punjab Civil Servants (Appointment and Terms of Service) Rules 1974 R 6 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Pro Foggy Promotion Intelligence Department Promotional Committee recommended the pro delegation to respond to the respondents 28 11 11 Effective from 1972. From the date when the applicant was promoted, such services were not approved by the Services and General Administration Department Service Tribunal, however, the respondents' position has been accepted that under R6, the Punjab Government employees. (Appointment and Terms of Service) Rules 1974, Services and General Administration Department did not have the authority to approve or reject the recommendations of the Departmental Publicity Committee. That only the secretaries of the relevant departments can pass such orders without referring them to the Services and the General Administration Department. And the Services and General Administration Department's order that refuses to approve the department's publicity committee's recommendation to promote pharma for respondents has no legal effect, with which this directive is approved. The recommendations of the promotion committee were implemented by the secretary. The relevant department validity services tribunal rightly found that the secretary of the department concerned was only competent to consider the recommendations of the department publicity committee case, so the department was right to approve the appropriate orders on the recommendation of the development committee. Was decided by the service tribunal would not be able to intervene in this matter. In the circumstances, the leave to appeal the Supreme Court was denied criminal advocate from Mehar lawyer