Find a Lawyer

BARAK ULLAH versus STATE

After applying his mind after appealing to the High Court for leave on the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, Section 5 (2) of the Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 161 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3). And every aspect of this case will be considered. Upon reading the entire available record and doing full justice, the accused against whom the accused was charged had received a defective sum in the presence of bail witnesses, explaining the recovery and withdrawal. Allegedly, but he failed to do so, the accused's lawyer refrained from appearing in court and giving arguments, after hearing the state's counsel for the High Court and dismissing the relevant record, which was fully qualified. It was justified in favor of rejecting what was implemented. With the law, nothing was available to show that the absence of a defense lawyer had caused any injustice to the accused or that the defense lawyer had any reason not to appear before Haig. h The court, in the circumstances, rejected the date of appeal for the date ask a advocate free from Patoki lawyer