MUHAMMAD NAHEED versus SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAY POLICE, RAWALPINDI
Police Rules 1934 R16 1 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) The Service Tribunal changed the offense of dismissal from service to the offense of dismissal from service. However, because the appellate forum can not only examine whether the order made by the appellate forum departmental authority was done with the help of materials, but in appropriate cases, it can only be a substitute for which it is considered more appropriate, However, due diligence by relevant law requires a fine. 8 16 1, One of the specific exemptions under the Police Rules, 1934, however, was not discriminated against by a public servant because of the low humiliation; 1) The police rules, in 1934, that a public servant was declared guilty of the Ghost Service. MS 8 8 1, Police Rules, 1934 There is no mitigating circumstance to alter the punishment given to civil servants, however, the challenge was not challenged by the respondents, the Supreme Court further commenting on this point. Avoid displaying situations
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
