S. MASOOD ALI versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL, BUREAU OF EMIGRATION AND OVERSEAS EMPLOYMENT, ISLAMABAD
Articles 8 and 9 of the Civil Servants Act 1973 and the Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) of the seniority / publicity respondents claiming progress in B-17 by its employees Challenged the development respondents, before the temporary list of applicants was shown to the junior, after which it submitted representation against a list which is still pending the decision before the departmental authority. That is, when the defendant filed an appeal before the service tribunal which was dismissed as prohibited under SA (1) (b). The Supreme Court of the Service Tribunals Act, 1973, refused to relieve the respondents in the leave application for the respondents' appeal, in the subsequent proceedings the tribunal was declared non-official by the department, however, not only this That civil servants were found to be incompetent and incapable of development. B17 preferentially held the position of B16 not only on a regular basis but also on the regular basis B16 itself, therefore, he was entitled to the post of B17 by public servants. Claimed that the matter has already been heard in the Supreme Court in the matter between the parties, and there is no point. A fresh order in the field, the appeal for leave to appeal before the service tribunal was not only banned as race josta but it also did not represent the entertainment department and the appeal for appeal by the Supreme Court. This hope was hopeless even after the dismissal of the Veterans' Leave request. And that the service tribunal has asked
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
