Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NAHEED versus SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAY POLICE, RAWALPINDS;

Police Rules 1934 R16 1 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) The Government Tribunal has removed the dismissal sentence from service by removing the Government employee misunderstood grave service from service. As an appellate forum, the service tribunal can examine whether an order made by a departmental authority was supported by the content, but in appropriate cases may be an alternative that is considered more appropriate, however relevant. Consideration should be punishable by law. The service was not one of the penalties set out under R1 1 1, the police rules, 1934 government employee was not caused by any prejudice due to lesser fines, the order to dismiss the civil servant was lawful and his According to R 2 2 (1), Police Rules, 193 1, a civil servant was banished from the service of the cemetery. Under Code of Conduct 8 16 1, the police rule, 1934, did not create any reduction in punishment for a public servant, however, the challenge was not challenged by the respondents, the Supreme Court further commenting on this point. Avoid displaying. The circumstances were denied tax advocates from Chohar Jamali lawyer