JAFFAR KHAN MANDOKHAIL versus RETURNING OFFICER
On the basis of the provisions of Articles 12 (2) (viii) and 14 (3) (d) (ii) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Constitution National Assembly, the nomination papers of the applicant for the seat of the National Assembly. Was rejected on. He declined to mention the nature of the exploratory nature of himself, his spouse and his dependents in the declaration forms attached to the nomination papers. No certified document was submitted by the objection to show that the applicant has assets and liabilities in his name or his name. In the name of the spouse or their dependents, however, there were some joint property owned by the petitioner that would be entitled to their share by the process of law. The declaration should only be for the assets and liabilities that the applicants, It has common characteristics of spouses and dependents, yet the applicant's grandfather and his father were the names of the returning officer who worked on speculation, rejecting the applicant's nomination papers, as there were no present. O In front of him to conclude that the applicant had specified in his declaration form Ayydadun applicant did not mention specific candidates was justified Rings
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Morgah lawyer