Find a Lawyer

INAYATULLAH versus ALTAF HUSSAIN

Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), 0 1, R10 Government of Balochistan Admission Policy, paragraph, 2 12 Maintaining non-joinder effect constitutional petition of the party Respondents initially admitted to engineering. The college was refused on the basis that it passed the Matriculation and FC exams from outside the province and the constitutional plea of the respondents was accepted and a thorough investigation was conducted under which it was told that the respondent There are good reasons for getting education from outside the province, so the respondents were recommended for admission and were invited to go to engineering college. He was admitted to Karachi. The accuracy respondent got higher marks than the Applicant Selection Committee, the fact that the respondents failed to pass the Matriculation and FC Examinations under Para 2 12 of the Government's Admission Policy for admission to the Engineering College Petitioner. Application is considered. Failing to show that the results were not evidence-based or that they were arbitrarily inaccurate, etc., so that a case was not found under Article 199 of the Constitution was eligible for intervention. Accordingly, the application was dismissed. immigration advocates contact from Digri lawyer