Find a Lawyer

DOST MUHAMMAD versus KHIZAR HAYAT

In the section 302 (c) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), a request for a revision to increase the section 439 conviction, the accused had clearly proven the offense by stating that he lied to his wife against another person. I was struck by the condition he was with. No evidence was presented by the accused in connection with the shootings, which shows that the person allegedly committed adultery with his wife and therefore it cannot be said that the commission for adultery could be seen. The accused had taken his life. The wife is subjected to severe and sudden provocation, however, the accused should have been incensed at seeing the person in her house, which caused the incident, and did not deserve to be acquitted. As a result, he was sentenced to three years. Was extended for five years - under the circumstances RI [conviction] list of supreme court advocates from Kumbh lawyer