MUHAMMAD TAHIR versus NAZIR AHMAD
The transfer of a civil suit from one court to another on the grounds of non-availability of the petition moved by the applicant under Sections 241 and 151, has been rejected by the CPC District Judge. The litigant has no right to sue a particular court. However, it is alleged that the matter should have been moved to another court to continue proceedings in the same court, neither this case was in the interest of litigation, nor the lawyers nor the courts. It was difficult to sue. The presiding officer's interest in his adversary courts is not limited to the number of courts; it was illogical to refer to the special court about litigation and not suitable for the delivery of justice; matters should be moved frequently so as to ensure justice. Can be made to prevent corruption.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Kotla Jam lawyer
