MUHAMMAD HANIF versus THE STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/109 Guarantee, Neither was mentioned in the FIR for providing information related to the accused. And neither did he disclose it. In the initial stages when the witnesses were examined, witnesses mentioned in their supplementary statements that they had heard the accused in his bayak asking for the murder of his son (the main accused), Sub-statement was not required after eye witnesses to give any weight, especially when the supplementary statement related to the same fact could not be recorded by law, in the circumstances the name of the accused in the FIR is significant. And his involvement in the case was one of further investigations in which the accused was admitted on bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Khanpur lawyer
