ASHIQ HUSSAIN versus STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 426 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), the suspension of section 324/379 was based on an alleged confession made by a co-accused who was neither confessed to a co-accused nor Evidence of prosecution has been shown on the accused itself. Despite the fact that no accused was registered under the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965 against the accused in connection with the recovery of arms, despite the fact that the complainant and the witnesses in this case were not all policemen nor the injured. Referring to the Medicare Legal Report. The accused was on record and no evidence was presented in which the accused was presented to prove the same case for the suspension of punishment, in which case the sentence was suspended.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Trinda Mohd Pannah lawyer
