Find a Lawyer

NATIONAL ADHESIVE TAPES (PVT)LTD versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Article 30 (b) and 32 (3) of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Penalty surcharge Demand for Petitioner / Importer Submitted and approved the former bond bills of entry in relation to imported goods within a fixed period. In order to clear the goods within seven days from the submission of the entry bills without payment of any penalty charge, after more than eight months have passed since the applicant cleared the goods, in connection with the payment of the penalty surcharge Showcase notice issued Authorities issue clearance notice in absence of applicant After the order was passed in which it was requested to submit a penalty charge within three days in which the applicant had submitted the entry bills within a fixed period, it was imposed and he was given a penalty charge. Payment was excluded. Because he paid the dues and cleared the goods perfectly, he was ordered on the same date if he had filed the bills of registration, but the customs authorities took the matter as usual and the applicant was issued the entry show. The clearance of the goods was allowed seven days after the issuance of the notice of the bill, otherwise the notice could be removed only on the occasion of the delimitation as it was issued after about nine years. Months after the clearance of the goods, under section 32 (3) of the Customs Act 1969, it was to be issued within six months of the customs authorities, which demanded a penalty surcharge from the applicant, was declared illegal, Under the circumstances list of supreme court advocates from Sara e Naurang lawyer