Find a Lawyer

BAKHT MODIN versus STATE

Criminal Procedure Code (CR PC) Section 19 Explosive Act (IV of 1884), Section 5 Explosive Rules, 1940, R 109 Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Section 188 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 195 (1) (a)) The definition of the Schedule of Evidence Arms Act, 1878, in the Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act (1975), is in its original form in the Malakand Division, charged with the facts and circumstances of the case. The accused was properly convicted and sentenced, and the property of the case, including the pick-up that was used for the commission of the crime, was also used under section 5 of the Explosives Act, 1884. Ray The offense was rightly confiscated, which was read with the Explosive Rules, 1940 KR 109, under which it was not a scheduled offense. The trial could not be conducted through a trial under the Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act, 1975. The trial court was not able to hear the complaint under section 188, PPC for a written complaint. Under section 195 (1) (a), conviction of persons convicted under the CRPC under Section 5 of the Explosive Act, 1884, and under the trial court, section 188, PPC Was set. However, the conviction and punishment of the accused was retained under Section 19 of the Arms Act, 1878, but its appeal was partially accepted. list of advocates from Shahkot lawyer