Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

ZAR-FROOSH versus SIKANDAR AZIZ


Sections 3, 17 and 24 of the Cantonment Rental Act 1963 constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application, the interim injunction governing rent rejection of applicants (tenants) under section 3 (4), It affects. The property in question belongs to the Cantonment Board, which temporarily allocated the landlord (respondent) on a temporary rental basis for one year, which had already been exhausted, so the rental controller could move forward. And there was no jurisdiction to reject the judicial decision. Such an interim order was challenged. The appeal against the qualifying interim order in the constitutional application was banned under section 24 of the Cantonment Rent Act, 1963, It was clearly pointed out that there is a special exclusion clause on appeal against the rental controller's interim order because only Ceased not to appeal the interim ruling was able to order the interim order

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of advocates from Chakwal lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.