ZAR-FROOSH versus SIKANDAR AZIZ
Sections 3, 17 and 24 of the Cantonment Rental Act 1963 constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application, the interim injunction governing rent rejection of applicants (tenants) under section 3 (4), It affects. The property in question belongs to the Cantonment Board, which temporarily allocated the landlord (respondent) on a temporary rental basis for one year, which had already been exhausted, so the rental controller could move forward. And there was no jurisdiction to reject the judicial decision. Such an interim order was challenged. The appeal against the qualifying interim order in the constitutional application was banned under section 24 of the Cantonment Rent Act, 1963, It was clearly pointed out that there is a special exclusion clause on appeal against the rental controller's interim order because only Ceased not to appeal the interim ruling was able to order the interim order
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Chakwal lawyer