Section 9 (a) (vi) and 14 (d) Define Evidence of Corruption and Corruption Practices by Misuse of Powers Establish a crime against the accused without a shadow of reasonable doubt by reliable, convincing, and reliable evidence. So as to enable the court to conclude that if the prosecution had succeeded in establishing the charges against the accused, the court would have concluded that there were so many charges against the accused. After reasonable doubt was not proved, then the accused was entitled to be acquitted of the criminal law, the prosecutor was obliged to prove his case beyond reasonable doubt and if the only and the slightest doubt arose, the benefit would be to the accused. Should have had enough. The story of the notorious prosecutor who was accused of a criminal offense was to be beheaded with L. It is possible when the prosecutor overruled all reasonable suspicion against him otherwise. Along with the documentary testimony of the prosecution witnesses, statements of court witnesses, observations of bank and financial experts, fraud, fraud, fraud and tampering of public records and accounts against the accused were fully established by the prosecution. The allegations leveled were completely proved and he was convicted Went to trial and was sentenced by the trial court.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
