Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

IKRAM-UD-DIN versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN


Civil Servants Act 1973 Section 10 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition Applicant, serving in the High Court, the Federal Shariat Court notification issued for the applicant's office was deemed appropriate. That may be more than her usual salary. The number of high court officials who were allowed to pay special salaries was sought by the Federal Shariat Court and allowed a deposition allowance, so even in the treatment authority's rule, the applicant could be deprived of a deposition allowance. No justification was granted to the applicant for special period allowance for special expenses in which the applicant suffered mental distress for so long.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of supreme court advocates from Sohawa District Daska lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.