Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD HANIF versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 (2) Contempt Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Guarantee, the defendant's grant did not injure the witnesses or the witnesses and the presence of an accused on the spot and his The only part of the role attributed to Lalcara can be decided in this case. The other accused had neither picked up Lalikara nor participated in the incident as his presence was not established even if the accused was related to the weapon. There was no clear action even when the lace was present. They were attributed, especially when the original accused did not repeat the fire. The involvement of the accused in this case was a matter of further investigation. The accused did not need further investigation and did not serve any useful purpose in the judicial closure. Could go Until an indefinite period, the accused was admitted on bail under conditions

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocates from Khanbel lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.