MUHAMMAD DIN versus ABSAR FATIMA
Civil Procedure Code Order III, R 3, O XLIII, R 3 and Section 115 suit against the Principal and the Attorney for the CPC recognized agents and applicants, together with the written statement from their Principal After the submission of such process to the court, the order of cancellation of power was also presented to the attorney by the trial court of the court ordering the principal to submit a new written statement on receipt of such cancellation process. The order in question was already suspended by the order of the High Court of Trial. To the extent that the rights of the plaintiffs were foreseen, under which they had made a claim under the written statement filed in the court on 19 1 5 1985, before the cancellation of the power of attorney. The trial court's decision was to be implemented, according to the trial court's hearing of the case. Such an order of the trial court in the jurisdiction to allow the defendant (principal) to file a fresh written statement was declared illegal by the High Court under section 115, CPC
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Jaffarabad lawyer