Peshawar High Court NWFP — Judgments of 1977

22 reported judgments of the Peshawar High Court NWFP from 1977.

  • AMIR HUSSAIN SHAH v. THE STATE 1977 PLD 1

    Section 162 is not a confession of confession to the police, but rather an excuse case and a preliminary statement pointing to the motive and the cause of the offense by the accused: Evidence Evidence…

  • QUDRAT RAHIM v. GHUFRAN 1977 PLD 15

    Section 497 (5) Cancellation of Bail against the accused The person charged with the crime of murder asserts that the accused has been charged with bail, to be granted bail, without any justification …

  • MUHAMMAD YOUSU F v. THE STATE 1977 PLD 17

    Sections 7497 and private 498 bailiffs This right to private rights is clear from the record and the fact that no one is charged with cross-case initiation of criminal transactions. On such a case, ho…

  • GHULAIVI MURTAZA v. CUSTODIAN OF EVACUEE PROPERTY 1977 PLD 19

    Section (43 ()) reads with section (1), (2) declaration of vacant property as a vacant property not only in Custodian, but also the house considered as vacant property, before January 1, 1957 The same…

  • MST. KASHMIRA JAN v. MAHTAB SHAH 1977 PLD 27

    Evidence for withholding evidence in the event of section 114 (g) being held…

  • GHULAM QADIR v. PAYAO KHAN 1977 PLD 30

    Section 1 561 A resident applicant from a district in another province has been charged with filing a complaint against the respondents in a criminal proceeding in his own district alleging that he wa…

  • SUB. MAJOR (RETD.) ANAR BADSHAH v. MOHSTN ALI KHAN 1977 PLD 33

    Article 199 Wright's Election Request for Wrong Election, in the circumstances of the case, was denied by Wright in relation to the matter concerning the recording of the pending dispute and the recor…

  • KAKAI AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE 1977 PLD 38

    Section 2 302 / [case [murder case] A joint-purpose car is being created momentarily, with the circumstances surrounding it indicating that the accused acted with knowledge and persisted in his act an…

  • MST. SEWAN AKHTAR (RBPAB\'ENTED TEHSIL NOSHERA) v. COLLECTOR (LAND ACQUISIZ10N), TEHSIL NOWSHERA AND 18 OTHERS 1977 PLD 45

    Section 18 and 30 Compensation, Maximum Term for Challenge Award and Transfer Collector to refer the case to the court although 6 months has not yet been set for the distribution of compensation initi…

  • MUHAMMAD YAQOOB v. CHAIRMAN, ELECTION TRIBUNAL 1977 PLD 50

    The court order on the appeal against the decisions of Section 151 Election Tribunal read with S5 64 (3) and 61 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908) has not been approved by the Election Commissioner nor ca…

  • MUHAMMAD JAN v. FAZAL AHMAD 1977 PLD 52

    Section 115 Review (Civil) Separate claims filed by two different plaintiffs, A and B of the case were stayed by the trial court till the decision of the A suit of A suit and the lower court dismissed…

  • BEFORE ABDUL GHANI KHAN KHATTAK AND USMAN ALI SHAH, JJ AND MUSLIM SHAH v. THE STATE 1977 PLD 55

    The explosives were examined extensively by the defense witness, but were not affected so that appellant's brother was simultaneously trapped and arrested on the same day as his brother, It was imposs…

  • MANAWAR DIN v. GUL ZAMAN 1977 PLD 59

    The events of the section 498 Bull Cross are occurring suddenly and both sides are injured. The available material does not indicate which party was charged with aggression, it was suspended on bail. …

  • CAPT. (REM.) SARDAR JAN GI.U .R KHAN v. MST. SAHIB SULTAN 1977 PLD 61

    A. XXXIV, 4 and 5 Mortgage Orders, Implementation of the Order in Suite Fox Receipt with Mortgage Receipt, With the Receipt of Rent Received Through Mortgage Property Sales, This Order Approved, In th…

  • SAID ANWAR v. THE STATE 1977 PLD 64

    Although the disappearance of Section 8 offenders is admissible under Section 8 as a conduct, sometimes individuals, altogether innocent, remain hidden. Such disappearance may not be a proof of guilt,…

  • NUR NAWAZ v. MUHAMMAD PIO 1977 PLD 70

    Section Pre 31 pre-emption suit delimitation period, for the purpose of pre-emption suit, runs from the date when the pre-emptor receives a notice of sale or appears to have received such notice [limi…

  • SHAISTA GUL v. QAZA KHAN 1977 PLD 74

    Section 42 reads with the Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 17 Fraudulent Positive Fraud actually accuses the court of misleading the court, which agrees with Jay's assertion that He is not talking a…

  • BADAR & BROTHERS (ARMS A AMMUNITIONS DEALERS), PESHAWAR v. MUHAMMAD ASLAM 1977 PLD 80

    The withdrawal requirement of section 17 (2), CL, (vi) section 17 (2), CT (vi) together with its application for withdrawal…

  • GUL SAID v. THE STATE 1977 PCRLJ 607

    Section 497 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCPC) was accused of ineffectively shooting the complainant late in the evening while in the dark.…

  • KAKAI v. THE STATE 1977 PCRLJ 608

    The section 302 reads with the Section 307 sentence, changing the wounds resulting from the gunshot wound, to hospitalization and treatment and after his recovery, he died, however, at trial. There is…

  • MUSLIM SHAH v. THE STATE 1977 PCRLJ 838

    Section 8 Terror8 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) read the Pressure on Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act (XV of 1975), Section 5 additional evidence, the right of either party to ente…

  • HAQ NAWAZ v. ILYAS 1977 PCRLJ 1113

    Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 5 Suppressing Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act (XV of 1975), Section 4 (1) and Explosives Act (VI of 1908), Sections 3 and 4 After a special court esta…

Other years — Peshawar High Court NWFP

2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1986 · 1985 · 1984 · 1983 · 1982 · 1981 · 1980 · 1979 · 1977 · 1976 · 1975 · 1974 · 1973 · 1972 · 1971 · 1970 · 1969 · 1968 · 1966 · 1965 · 1964 · 1963 · 1962 · 1961 · 1960 · 1959 · 1958 · 1957 · 1956 · 1955 · 1954 · 1953 · 1951 · 1950

Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.