Peshawar High Court NWFP — Judgments of 1963

34 reported judgments of the Peshawar High Court NWFP from 1963.

  • JAMSHED AHMAD KHAN v. AURANGZEB KHAN AND OTHERS 1963 PLD 1

    The Constitution of Pakistan 1962 was read with Article 58 Article 250 and the Constitution of Pakistan (1956); Application for leave to appeal in Article 158 Supreme Court case was decided by the Hig…

  • GULISTAN AND OTHERS v. THE STATE 1963 PLD 6

    Pakistan Penal Code reads with Sections 394 Sections 397, 390 and 391 to attack the accused attacker and withdraw money from his pocket under the good faith belief that the money was part of them, gui…

  • FAZAL RAHIM v. THE STATE 1963 PLD 10

    Further investigations or additional evidence read with Section 374 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) Section 375 are eligible for order during the High Court of Appeal hearing or its lawyer has n…

  • SHAISTA KHAN v. THE STATE 1963 PLD 17

    The Pakistan Penal Code Section 468 thumb impression, documented as a forgery, is believed by a fingerprint expert to be a mere guess and not a conviction based on speculation; (1 of 1872), section 45…

  • DILBAR KHAN v. THE STATE 1963 PLD 21

    Frontier Crimes Regulation 1901 expired under Sections L, 14 and 15 Section 209, referring to the CCP Deputy Commissioner Matters Council of Elders, without separating the Order of Exclusion, and Sect…

  • GUL REHMAN v. BOSTAN AND OTHERS 1963 PLD 27

    CPC Death, Marriage and Party Insolvency ACCC Civil Procedure Code Order XXII, r 4 (3) joint and non-partition reduction against the defendants and appeal the trial if you only prosecute the defendant…

  • BAHADUR KHAN v. THE STATE 1963 PLD 34

    Criminal Code (CR PC) Section 215 Lack of Evidence…

  • GULISTAN v. THE STATE 1963 PLD 38

    In a mere statement of the Pakistan Penal Code Section 376 prosecution, it is not necessary for a criminal action to prove a crime but to support the party as a supporting partner.…

  • MUHAMMAD AKRAM KHAN v. QAIM DIN 1963 PLD 49

    Civil Code 1908 Section 100 Unlawful Seizure of Tenancy Rights and Disclaimer Combined questions of law and fact are able to be raised in the Second Appeal Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908) [as amended b…

  • THE STATE v. AMIR KHAN 1963 PLD 54

    The Arsenal Rules may retain all or any of the prohibitions contained in the Progressive Local Government Act, Column 1924, Third Party, but do not have the authority to introduce new prohibitions on …

  • QASIM KHAN AND ANOTHER v. MST. MALKAT AND OTHERS 1963 PLD 58

    An amended ordinance 1962 section 59 (4) of the Code of Conduct can be regarded as a valid appeal, strictly established within a period of limitation, as the second appeal was timely prohibited becaus…

  • MST. ZEBUN NISA KURESHY v. CHIEF SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER, PAKISTAN 1963 PLD 61

    In the exercise of the writ jurisdiction, the order of the High Court, in the jurisdiction of the appeal, in the jurisdiction of an appeal, to decide the matter, in order to decide the matter before t…

  • ZABTA KHAN v. THE STATE 1963 PLD 66

    The Declaration of Evidence Act 1872, Section 32, found that such a declaratory test could be based solely on the test of determining the authenticity of the Declaration Concepts (XLY of 1860), Sectio…

  • MUHAMMAD ULLAH v. THE STATE 1963 PLD 77

    Interested witnesses do not need reciprocal contact because in the case of a partner, the certified does not necessarily have to be with the oral testimony of another independent witness, in which cas…

  • MUHAMMAD UMAR KHAN v. CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, PAKISTAN 1963 PLD 85

    Under the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1958, Houses read with Schedule V, Schedule V, Para 4 of Schedule to Act can be transferred only under Settlement Scheme V and by not…

  • MASHAL KHAN v. FAZAL KARIM AND ANOTHER 1963 PLD 93

    Under the Civil Procedure Code Order XXXII of the CPC Suite against or against persons of minor and non-mounted persons, r 3 terms must be strictly non-compliant and when there is an error in the appo…

  • ABDUL MALIK v. ABDUL JABBAR 1963 PLD 105

    Sections 17 and 16 of the NWFP Pre-Emission Act 1950 deprive a person of pre-emption suits by reselling the right to pre-emption during the trial when he or she has the right to resell the plaintiff. …

  • HAJI GULA JAN AND OTHERS v. SAHIB GUL AND OTHERS 1963 PLD 110

    As long as the clause 11 of the NWFP Restoration Land Act 1950 is mortgaged in respect of the same mortgage in addition to the mortgage from the father, there is no question of two separate mortgage m…

  • YOUSAF AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE 1963 PLD 118

    The sole test of the sole responsibility of the Pakistan Penal Code Section 34 Joint Intent is the fact that multiple defendants participated in the crime is not enough to convict each of the offenses…

  • MALIK BANARAS v. SYED FARMAN SHAH 1963 PLD 128

    Section 17 (2), Explanation of Registration Act 1908 [as presented in the Registration (Amendment Act (11 of 1927)]] device is a contract for the sale of immovable property even though the registratio…

  • FARID GUL AND ANOTHER v. HAJI GUL HASSAN AND OTHERS 1963 PLD 133

    Controversial theory does not apply in Pakistan Real estate sale contract separates after the expiration of years on payment of the sale price by the seller or contract by the seller to provide the pr…

  • JEHANZEB KHAN v. THE STATE 1963 PLD 145

    Sections 236, 237, 238 and 423 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CR PC), sections 237 and 238, exempt from the general rule that the accused cannot be convicted of a crime for which he has not been c…

  • MUHAMMADULLAH v. THE STATE 1963 PLD 161

    Sections 133 and 8 of the Evidence Act 1872, Morris (i) fugitive accused has long been absconding There cannot be enough action to admit the offender to prove that the accused fled after the incident.…

  • SYED IJAZ ALI SHAH v. MST. IQBAL BEGUM 1963 PLD 175

    Criminal Code of Criminal Procedure Code (CRPC) Section 107 Demanding Security Demand The magistrate has failed to record anyone facing a person who may or may not commit a breach of the peace. Take a…

  • GULZAR KHAN v. THE STATE 1963 PLD 178

    Section 164 Confirmation of a Co-accused's Confession…

  • THE STATE v. MUNAWAR KHAN, ADVOCATE 1963 PLD 195

    The initial phase of the principle of approving a waiver submitted to the Advocate for presenting evidence before a lawyer for the High Court, Section 3 of the contempt of court Act 1926, however, bur…

  • MST. BIBI ALAM TAJ AND OTHERS v. MST. INAYAT BEGUM 1963 PLD 199

    Mohammedan Laws Separation and Succession Definition of limited interest The Mahomedan law recognizes a limited term interest in the use of property, but it is owned by an infinite period. The individ…

  • MUHAMMAD DAUD v. SHER BAHADUR KHAN AND ANOTHER 1963 PLD 217

    The West Pakistan Civil Rent Ordinance 1959 does not include the jurisdiction of section 13, civil courts, to prosecute tenants on the basis of section 13 civil code rule (V of 1908), section 9.…

  • AJAB KHAN AND OTHERS v. THE STATE 1963 PLD 224

    Section 40 Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner together have the authority to provide security to a person and by default he is sentenced to a term of more than 3 years, more than one year by the Dep…

  • ABDUL KARIM AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE 1963 PLD 233

    Criminal Procedure for Criminal Procedure (CRPC) Sections 118 & 243 Against Consent Or Preparation Bond Implemented…

  • NAWAB AND OTHERS v. THE STATE 1963 PLD 236

    Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Claims for Claims 133 and 139 of Public Rights The court is not competent to decide a title question in proceedings under Section 133.…

  • MUHAMMAD AFZAL KHAN BANGASH v. THE STATE AND ANOTHER 1963 PLD 238

    Criminal Procedure Code (CR PC) Section 144 Interpretation Order Leaving to Identify the Material Facts of Ultra-Virus and Illicit Matters…

  • TAUHEED GUL AND OTHERS v. THE STATE 1963 PLD 242

    Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 20c5 8c209 Under Section 209, a revisional court revisits an order dismissing an inquiry magistrate after an investigation by an accused magistrate and close ev…

  • MST. MAHALLAH v. ABDUL MASTAN KHAN AND OTHERS 1963 PLD 247

    The value of the words in Section 18 and C2 (h) of section 18 (1) of the West Pakistan Civil Courts Ordinance 1962 means that the subject matter of the suit is subject to market value and suit value a…

Other years — Peshawar High Court NWFP

2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1986 · 1985 · 1984 · 1983 · 1982 · 1981 · 1980 · 1979 · 1977 · 1976 · 1975 · 1974 · 1973 · 1972 · 1971 · 1970 · 1969 · 1968 · 1966 · 1965 · 1964 · 1963 · 1962 · 1961 · 1960 · 1959 · 1958 · 1957 · 1956 · 1955 · 1954 · 1953 · 1951 · 1950

Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.