Peshawar High Court NWFP — Judgments of 1972
21 reported judgments of the Peshawar High Court NWFP from 1972.
- JUMA KHAN v. MST. GUL FEROSHA 1972 PLD 1
Procedure for hearing and trial under Section 25 and 47 (c) and Section 25, Guardians and Wards Act 1890 under the West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964), Sections 25 and 14 Senior Civil Judge…
- INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, WEST PAKISTAN AND ANOTHER v. ABDUR RASHID KHAN 1972 PLD 13
NWFP Police Rules 1937 CHAPTER XIII, r 13 and the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 List F has been appointed by the Deputy Inspector General in his office under N 13: WFP Police Rules, 1937 …
- IFTIKHAR v. THE STATE 1972 PLD 27
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 286 (2) Public Prosecutor Conduct of Prosecution Case, at its discretion, two prosecution witnesses for close relationship with the two defendants and for not s…
- SAR ANJAM KHAN v. MIR AFZAL KHAN AND 14 OTHERS 1972 PLD 37
Martial Law Regulation 1959 Nos. 4 (6) and 27 (2) of the civil court's Chief Land Commissioner's rainfall, in its land-related dispute, ordered its heirs or rebels to remain in the area To seek legal …
- HAJI MUHAMMAD ALI KHAN AND 4 OTHERS v. NUR MUHAMMAD KHAN AND 15 OTHERS 1972 PLD 66
The West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance 1959 Section 13 and Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Section 9, have been leased to civilian remote land for cinema for a period of 20 years under th…
- SATTAR KHAN AND 3 OTHERS v. MST. ZAMU JAN 1972 PLD 78
149 of the Limits Act 1908 and 132 abstain from mortgage subrogation and partnership principles. mortgage of the year fixed term and not all mortgaged property ending in mortgage date…
- THE STATE v. AMINULLAH AND ANOTHER 1972 PLD 92
Evidence of medical testimony, however significant, of section 302 and the Evidence Act (I of 1872), section 45, is not required to be read conclusively on a factual basis on the basis of the statemen…
- THE STATE v. GUL BADSHAH 1972 PLD 105
Fake evidence read with the Pakistan Penal Code Section 193 Criminal Code (v. 1898), Sections 195 and 476 has already appeared during the proceedings before the court or in the case of two conflicting…
- MUHAMMAD SARFARAZ KHAN AND ANOTHER v. FARID KHAN AND 22 OTHERS 1972 PLD 109
Transfer of section 41 of section 41 of the Property Act 1882. The exception is that no one can move beyond the title to which he himself has entered the F in the ownership column in the Composite Bon…
- SAMAR QAND AND ANOTHER v. MUHAMMAD YOUNAS 1972 PLD 115
Code of Civil Procedure 1908 Section 100 Second Appeal The finding of fact together by the following courts is not worth the interference (in the second appeal).…
- MUHAMMAD ABBAS v. SULTAN KHAN AND 2 OTHERS 1972 PLD 122
Frontier Province Pre-Emission Act 1950 Section 19 Pre-Impression Suite Faith…
- MIR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. NIAZ MUHAMMAD (DECEASED) AND 2 OTHERS 1972 PLD 128
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) read with Article 195, Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), disobedience to order of section 188 public servants, confession relating to crimes listed in section (a) of secti…
- MUHAMMAD SAMIN JAN v. MESSRS FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LTD., NOWSHERA AND 2 OTHERS 1972 PLD 133
AX, r 13 and OV, r 20 Presenting the order against the defendant, the former party served the defendant's defendant: Placing a copy of it at a prominent place in the court house in the court OV. 20 Th…
- SAJID HUSSAIN v. MST. SHAH SULTAN 1972 PLD 136
Articles 4, 12, 15 (1) and 17 of the West Pakistan Civil Rent Restriction Ordinance were read with the Court Fees Act (VI of 1870), Schedule II, Article II and Schedule I, sections 4 and 12 of Article…
- QUTAB KHAN v. SAIN SULTAN AND 3 OTHERS 1972 PLD 142
Orders for the amount expressed in the execution of a decree for the amount in Section 5 and 2 (b), (c) of the West Pakistan Relief of Obedience Ordinance, 1960 and section 35 of the Civil Code of Con…
- MUHAMMAD-PLAINTIFF v. RAZ GUL-DEFENDANT 1972 PLD 146
Section 18 of the Border Pre-Emission Act 1950 states that 21 brothers and two brothers, L and M, have the right to exonerate because the former plaintiff has relinquished his rights under section 21 …
- MUHAMMAD YOUSAF KHAN KHATTAK v. S. M. AYUB AND 2 OTHERS 1972 PLD 151
National and Provincial Assembly (Elections) Ordinance 1970 Section 64 (3) High Court Powers Tribunal Hears Appeal Against High Court Decision Special jurisdiction to stop the execution of a High Cour…
- SAID FAQIR AND 7 OTHERS v. N. W. F. P. GOVERNMENT THROUGH HOME SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, PESHAWAR AND 9 OTHERS 1972 PLD 156
The High Court's written jurisdiction in relation to the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Arts 199, 261 (7) and 260 tribal areas (former states of Chitral, Dir and Swat), in connection with land-related …
- NUR AHMAD v. MUHAMMAD JAN KHAN AND 3 OTHERS 1972 PLD 164
The appeal of the patent against the order of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 and 54 of the Letters Patent (Lahore), CL10 Actor Judge was approved in the appeal under section 54 of Act I of 1894. Letter…
- MUHAMMAD YOUSAF KHAN KHATTAK v. S. M. AYUB AND 2 OTHER 1972 PLD 175
Civil Procedure Code Order XII of CPC Production, Expansion and Return of Documents O XIII, r 4 Validation on Documents That Are Not Authenticated by Documents Verified by O XIII, Still Exhibited can …
- THE COLLECTOR, MARDAN AND 2 OTHERS v. MST. TAJ BIBI AND 14 OTHER 1972 PLD 197
Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 18 An application should be filed against this question against which the Collector has any objection. Once the Collector determines the issue of limitation, the refe…
Other years — Peshawar High Court NWFP
2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1986 · 1985 · 1984 · 1983 · 1982 · 1981 · 1980 · 1979 · 1977 · 1976 · 1975 · 1974 · 1973 · 1972 · 1971 · 1970 · 1969 · 1968 · 1966 · 1965 · 1964 · 1963 · 1962 · 1961 · 1960 · 1959 · 1958 · 1957 · 1956 · 1955 · 1954 · 1953 · 1951 · 1950
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.