Labour Appellate Tribunal Sindh — Judgments of 1972
28 reported judgments of the Labour Appellate Tribunal Sindh from 1972.
- MESSRS JALEEL BROTHERS LTD., KARACHI v. EMPLOYEES UNION 1972 PLC 5
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 34 Under section 34, maintaining the end of an industrial dispute is not a prerequisite to the condition that non-payment of dues to employees gives rise to…
- WORKERS UNION v. TRANS-OCEANIC STEAMSHIP COMPANY LTD., KARACHI 1972 PLC 44
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 was read with section 37 (3) of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), section 12 appeals against the limit spent on obtaining a copy of the appeal and the court wrot…
- 1972 PLC 64 1972 PLC 64
Due to mismanagement, the dismissal inquiry officer does not have the opportunity for a hearing, in which case, the employer has been ordered by the Labor Court to re-arrange without condition and all…
- THE WORKMEN v. THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN, IRRIGATION POWER, HYDERABAD 1972 PLC 66
Section 6 (8) of the West Pakistan Industrial Disputes Ordinance 1968 read with the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII 1968), Section 1 Proviso 4 (e), …
- ZAHOOR AHMAD v. THE LABOUR COURT OF SIND 1972 PLC 78
West Pakistan Industrial Disputes Ordinance 1968 Section 37 (2) Allowance for Termination Due to Corruption The Labor Appellate Tribunal refuses to present some witnesses in support of a plea of not g…
- 1972 PLC 80 1972 PLC 80
Articles 45 and 36 (2) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 read with the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Sections 151 and OXIXIX RR1 and 2, prohibiting the application of a strike under Section…
- 1972 PLC 83 1972 PLC 83
Unlawful dispute misconduct means misconduct of employees who file a malpractice lawsuit against employees under the Inappropriate Practices Act, although employees who are under the age of 18 at the …
- MESSRS INDUS CHEMICAL & ALKALIS LTD., KARACHI v. WORKERS UNION 1972 PLC 117
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 40 (3) Establishment Award made effective, question of ordering stay, not holding, does not arise under the circumstances…
- GENERAL IRON AND STEEL WORKS LTD., KARACHI v. ABDUL WAHAB KHAN 1972 PLC 215
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 34 [as amended by the Industrial Relations Ordinance (XIX of 1970]] Section 34 amends clauses relating to potential and frustration not only to the proc…
- 1972 PLC 219 1972 PLC 219
Applicants for review of applicants also wish to review the document based on the possession in their possession at the time of the order of the Labor Appellate Tribunal, in the circumstances, rejecte…
- WORKERS\' UNION v. MESSRS INDUS CHEMICALS & ALKALIS LTD., KARACHI 1972 PLC 220
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 has been read with section 34 sections 2 (III), 2 (xix), 26, 28, 43 and 47. Section 43 has the application of the words "fixed style" of the Labor Court, which …
- UNITED ORIENTAL STEAMSHIP COMPANY, KARACHI v. NOOR GUL 1972 PLC 281
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 34 and 37 [as amended by the Industrial Relations (Amendment) Ordinance (XIX of 1970]] Application of an individual worker under section 34 applicable under…
- THE GENERAL SECRETARY, PROVINCIAL BUILDINGS EMPLOYEES\' UNION, HYDERABAD v. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PROVINCIAL BUILDINGS DIVISION 1972 PLC 285
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 1 (3) Department Employees of the Department of Buildings Government are not excluded from the scope of the ordinance provisions, which apply to the buildin…
- MESSRS TRANS-OCEANIC STEAMSHIP COMPANY LTD., KARACHI v. TRANS-OCEANIC STEAMSHIP COMPANY WORKERS UNION 1972 PLC 290
The Industrial Disputes Ordinance 1959 was read with section 37 (36) of the 37th and the award was declared in open court judgment, however, not a simple irregularity written at a later date nor affec…
- MESSERS TAJ RESTAURANT, KARACHI v. WORKERS\' UNION 1972 PLC 297
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 32 The matter relating to the referencing of the Labor Court by the Provincial Government cannot be excluded from the award because under Section 32 the par…
- 1972 PLC 310 1972 PLC 310
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 38 Appeal Question: In fact, it was not raised before the Labor Court, which is not allowed to raise the question.…
- Haji MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM v. DAWOOD CHAND 1972 PLC 315
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 37 Appeal Decision The party having knowledge of the previous Labor Court order passed against them in the absence of it, was laid by the Supreme Court in S…
- WORKERS\' UNION v. MESSRS ADAM TEA BLENDING FACTORY, KARACHI, 1972 PLC 488
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 read in section 34 and 45 under section 37 which is introduced under section 34 and 45. The provisions of section 37 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, cannot b…
- 1972 PLC 490 1972 PLC 490
The West Pakistan Road Transport Workers Rules 1962 does not find the court worker guilty of the charge he deserves on the duty worker, however, by applying for a labor court after eight months withou…
- IFTIKHAR JAMIL v. MANAGING DIRECTOR, ARBOR ACRESS PAKISTAN LTD., KARACHI 1972 PLC 492
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 34 read with the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), section O 15 (5) on the charge of misappropri…
- LABOUR UNION v. GENERAL MANAGER, INDUS GLASS WORKS LTD. HYDERABAD 1972 PLC 494
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 50 Document Interpretation Terms of Settlement: (1) The management agrees to handle the contractor's department. (ii) All terms and conditions of service an…
- 1972 PLC 497 1972 PLC 497
It is understood that Section 56 is registered under the Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 67, the Industrial Relations (Amendment) Ordinance (XIX of 1970), Section 30 and the Tr…
- 1972 PLC 500 1972 PLC 500
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section OS12, 15 and 18 Applicable employer shall submit a charge sheet under the provisions of rules applicable to …
- WORKERS UNION v. MESSRS A. REHMAN TEXTILE INDUSTRIES, KARACHI 1972 PLC 503
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 6 (8) Section 16 was read with appeal, not by the five elected representatives of the employees, but by the union through its General Secretary Workers.…
- MESSRS ZAIBTUN TEXTILE MILLS LTD. v. LABOUR UNION, KARACHI 1972 PLC 507
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 34, collective bargaining agent and worker separately separately, appears in court to resolve individual workers' complaints submitted on each applicati…
- EMPLOYEES\' UNION v. MWSRS FISHERMEN\'S CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., KARACHI 1972 PLC 576
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 34 Establishment employees can create a common problem to secure their future interest.…
- 1972 PLC 581 1972 PLC 581
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section A12 Employee Transfer Terms of Service Neither explicitly nor the option of transferring property from one c…
- WORKMEN REPRESENTED BY THE FAUJI SUGAR MILLS EMPLOYEES UNION v. THE FAUJI SUGAR MILLS, TANDO MUHAMMAD KHAN 1972 PLC 586
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 50 Document Interpretation Memorandum Reading Memorandum / Parties Agree to Refer to Dispute Regarding Bonus Formula Disputes When deciding on the default f…
Other years — Labour Appellate Tribunal Sindh
2000 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1986 · 1985 · 1984 · 1983 · 1982 · 1981 · 1979 · 1977 · 1976 · 1974 · 1973 · 1972 · 1971
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.