Find a Lawyer

SARDARA versus STATE

Sections 1414 & 9 of the Criminal Code (CCPC) and surety bond forfeiture applicant, who had been held for the accused, formally informed the court about the accused's address through the application. In which he clearly stated that the accused had refused to appear before the court and before the police could be provided with the help of the police to ensure his production, hence the petitioner had the accused Was inspired by his sincere efforts to bring about the birth and the application he made. In this case, he would not be required to discharge his responsibility in connection with the production / unemployment of the accused and the result of his bail bonds, which was an uneducated and rural tenant. Should have In view of the principles of equality, fairness and respect for the time of natural justice, the penalties in question which read as part of every legal enforcement witnessed in which the court is generally obligated to perform its judicial duties, Especially when you want to be fined for failing to fulfill the promise made to the court that is solely at its discretion, by allowing maximum allowance for sowing duties. Established effectively by the explanation offered for any such failure, the trial court was ordered to seize the bonds of the bail bonds and instruct the applicant to collect the bail amount as the circumstances amended. The request for was allowed. immigration advocates email from Sherani lawyer