TARIQ SAEED versus DIRECTOR, ANTI-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT, PUNJAB, LAHORE
Prevention of Corruption Act 1947 Section 5 (2) Constitutional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 161/409/420/468/471/218/201/109 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition Authority of Anti-Corruption In the cases filed against the Establishment, Punjab, it was challenged to seek and prosecute the accused that the government had already withdrawn the case, the accused could not be prosecuted and submitted by the responsible director anti-corruption. The challan was made unnecessary under the law against him because when the Minister withdrew the case, he was a competent authority who questioned whether to return the matter. Whether it was made by a competent authority or a fact is not a disputed question, its constitutional jurisdiction cannot be resolved. The High Court, which was limited to issuing directives on the matters of law and not accusing any executive order, consequently directed its remedy. rom rejected by disqualifying constitutional request of relevant authority
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Rawalpindi lawyer