Find a Lawyer

KARACHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY versus HASSANUDDIN AHMED

Karachi Development Authority Allotment Regulations Regulations 7 (d) and 23 Karachi Development Authority Order (5 of 1957), Article 131 plot in question was allotted by the claimant The second installment was submitted by the plaintiff but the possession was not handed over to the plaintiff. After this the plot is allotted. For the plaintiff and he erected the building, however, was never canceled in favor of the plaintiff, however, the two courts did not pass judgment on the plaintiff's case below the evidence of the plaintiff's order that the plaintiff's allotment order Was never canceled and no such action was taken. Therefore, the authority was not in a position to allocate a similar plot to the defendant during the presence of the first allotment; both the courts below decided such facts in favor of the plaintiff; Could not show any reason for disagreeing with the grant of. The plot in favor of the defendant was illegal and without any legal jurisdiction and jurisdiction, however, no evidence was brought on record to show that the allotment was subsequently given notice of the allotment of the same plot in favor of the plaintiff. Was. The occupation of the plots being discussed, the sale process was carried out and the construction of such plots was enhanced so that full justice could be done to the parties, the approval of the alternative plot on the plaintiff and the old rate in the area in which it was pending, It was allotted. , Was the only solution for which the Authority decided to do so correctly, the Authority was directed to allocate alternative plots to the plaintiff on the old plot in which the underlying plot was allotted. To him, per se property advocate from Yazman Mandi lawyer