MST. SAKINA versus S.H.O. POLICE STATION BASTI MALOOK
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 491 Habitat Corps petitioners specifically stated that he was not abducted by his older sister's 'wall' (extortionate) and that the respondents expelled him from his mother's house. Was. He set a case for dissolution of the marriage The police had filed a case under the section 16 (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 of adultery and exceeded his authority to move the case in favor of the defendants so that he could be detained. Should be recovered. And was handed over to them by a process other than the law, which was the only misuse of the law practice in the police FIR section under which the aforementioned criminal case was registered, resulting in the termination. And the ditino was handed over to freedom. Accordingly, his mother Habitat Corps' request was disposed of
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Naukot lawyer
