Find a Lawyer

HEADMASTER, GOVERNMENT ZIA-UL-ALOOM HIGH SCHOOL, RAJA BARAZ, RAWALPINDI versus CHAIRMAN, EVACUEE TRUST PROPERTY BOARD

Building Species for the IQQ Trust Properties (Management and Disposal) Act 1975 Section 30 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OXXX, RR1 and 2 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 9, 37 and 199 Constitutional Application Temporary Occupancy of the Applicant To claim that the applicant had a specific part of the building running a property on the property of the Evacuee Trust Board, the applicant was in possession of it, but was subsequently occupied by the defendant (Building) Building. Was in possession of which the applicant's school was located and was subject to the authority and management of the respondent that the evacuation trust property Nokia Trust Property Board had decided 5 5 1976 that their property will hand over to their schools after the school had decided to transfer this property to the schools. The applicant (school) of the provincial governments was in possession of such property, so, this was the first case for provisioning the interim order after the inspection of the building regarding the seizure of a specific portion of the building's director education. It has been reported that that part of the question was formerly in the use of the school and if its occupation was not restored, the children would suffer in education, which would result. Special damage to children and general loss to the nation: Balance of convenience. As such, all laws should be interpreted in order to advance the constitutional order in favor of the applicant for provision of temporary relief, and the intention of the constituents must also consider the question of irreparable harm if the students Provision for temporary relief will be considered if it is excluded. Amenities law firms from Dijkot lawyer