Find a Lawyer

ALI SHAH versus QAMAR ABBAS

Evidence of allegations of corruption and illicit practice in holding an election under Section 52 of the Public Act 1976 did not disclose the exact statement of material facts in support of the allegedly corrupt and illegal practices in the election application. Specific allegations in connection with casting of votes for corrupt or unlawful candidates for illegal returning candidates at specific polling stations and for counting of votes against the applicant. The absence of can not be accepted. The Returning Officer did not specifically pray for the re-enumeration of ballot papers by the applicant for fishing or on-going investigations, but merely prayed for the return of the respondents to be illegal and invalid. The applicant who receives the most votes should be declared as a Returning Candidate or Alternate. Re-election by the Returning Officer in the constituency petitioner Returning Officer did not show any specific ground for re-counting of ballot papers; No specific object was identified by the Result Officer for stabilizing the results. The applicant did not identify any specific instance where all the ballot papers were counted, where any presiding officer had acted illegally in counting the votes, the returning officer gave appropriate reasons in his order that Reject applicant's request for recalculation online advocate from Orakzai lawyer