MAHMOOD KHAN versus MUHAMMAD ASHIQ
The Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 185 (3) of the Supreme Court Rules, 1980, O XIII, R1, O XXXIII, Rr 3 and 6 was forty days banned on appeal for leave because on behalf of the applicants. The only respondents were the reason for such a delay. Defrauding the applicants from filing an appeal for leave, assuring them that they would transfer the land to them and settle the matter with the court, though the oath of one of the applicants. This type of request was not verified by name. , Unless they took the risk of filing a timely application until they were fully cautious. Applicants, who were more than one in number, cannot be charged by the defendants, especially when all attorneys have been assisted by them. Weaver did not accept the explanation presented for the delay in applying for leave for appeal by the applicant, so there was no matter of merits that the case for increasing the appeal for leave for appeal was ever decided Was not done
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Larkana lawyer
