Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ISHAQ versus THE STATE

Prohibited (Order) Order 1979 Article Article 4 Evidence Defined The prosecution was not fair in this case from the outset All the witnesses in the case were police officers and despite having enough time to obtain confidential information to obtain a search warrant and The police did not comply with the law's requirements for sharing public witnesses in the recovery proceedings and the accused was discharged from the case court, nor did the prosecutor actually prosecute the accused, even though a large amount of opium and cannabis were consumed. There was a hate crime in the series. He was convicted, yet the accused was released because of hidden hands because the accused was acquitted on the basis of unauthorized evidence. jobs for advocates from Dinga lawyer