Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD ISHAQ versus THE STATE


Prohibited (Order) Order 1979 Article Article 4 Evidence Defined The prosecution was not fair in this case from the outset All the witnesses in the case were police officers and despite having enough time to obtain confidential information to obtain a search warrant and The police did not comply with the law's requirements for sharing public witnesses in the recovery proceedings and the accused was discharged from the case court, nor did the prosecutor actually prosecute the accused, even though a large amount of opium and cannabis were consumed. There was a hate crime in the series. He was convicted, yet the accused was released because of hidden hands because the accused was acquitted on the basis of unauthorized evidence.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous high court advocate from Khairpur Nathan Shah lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.