Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus RAFIQ AHMED

Sections 7, 28 and 30 of Pakistan Registration Act, 1908 (1973), 185 (3), the legality of the registered sale deed was challenged on the land which was registered in the \ T registered land though the land under s. was located in The validity registrar was empowered to receive any document irrespective of the property in any part of Pakistan if he is satisfied that there is sufficient reason to do so, the joint registrar also has the authority to pass the section 7 ( 2) may exercise the powers of the Registrar under the Registration Act. The Joint Registrar had documents available under it, no issue was fixed as to whether such powers were assigned or whether the Registrar gave any permission under Section 30 (2) Registration Act, 1908, the applicant. Had failed to insist on the formation of such a case. The sale was filed in 1973 against the transaction which took effect in 1952 The plaintiff's own evidence shows that he knew the registration of the sale contract since 1952, the suit being a time bar. Although it is conceded that the plaintiff did not appear before the Joint Registrar in 1952, the plaintiff could not prove that the defendants had committed any fraud against them under which the High Court confirmed that the plaintiff's case. Was in effect at that time. Forbidden, therefore, no interference is guaranteed but permission to appeal is denied in the circumstances advocate for immigration from Thana Bula Khan lawyer