Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARIF versus NAWAB

Sections 135, 130 and 172 (xviii) of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967, Land Reforms Regulations, 1972 (MLR 115), paragraph 22 (i) of the Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), sections 9 and 115 Re-share of such land by the legal claimant of the civil-civil court of the joint-occupied residential area, ie all the land under consideration and adjoining land, was listed in the Revenue Record to show the tax, Assessed, that is why it was considered an agricultural land and the jurisdiction of the Civil Court was banned under Section 172 (xviii). D'Revenue Act, 1967 did not guarantee the application of the complainant with which it has built in the revenue record. Upon settlement the land revenue, therefore, will not be excluded from the jurisdiction of the Civil Court if in this case the land, in the area built with shops, houses and factories, etc., is still assessed for the revenue of the land. If so, it is a fact that the estimation of land revenue on a particular land will not make it an agricultural land unless it is proved that it was used for agricultural purposes or for agricultural purposes. Once the underground area is built, the civil court will have jurisdiction, after the land is protected, under the Martial Law Regulation, 1972 (ML R_ 115). The residential area has become a bar of jurisdiction, its importance will be lost and otherwise it could not be revised even if it was not discussed before the appellate court verdict. Was. Conditions famous high court advocate from Nilam lawyer